March 2009


I’ve recently taken possession of a very tidy Omega Speedmaster Professional otherwise known as the ‘Moon Watch’.  During my usual inspection of the movement, my typically dour disposition was sowewhat lifted by the revelation that the manufacture date was the same year as my birthday, 1970.   The date also has rather more important significance to mankind in that, while I was being ushered into the world, Jack Swigert, Jim Lovell and Fred Haise were fighting for survival during their ill-fated excursion to the moon.  The history books state that the Speedmaster was used to time the critical course correction ‘burn’ to send them back to earth, although much hay has been made by conspiracists, fuelled notably from a misconstrued quote from  “The Best of Times: Rolex, an unauthorized History“, (Dowling and Hess) leading many to believe (mostly Rolex officionados) that Jack Swigert’s Rolex GMT was used for the task.    Chuck Maddox wrote a great essay on the subject which was certainly enough to convince me of the true facts surrounding the event.  The internet is an amazing place but where a million voices have replaced one, it becomes rather more dificult to discern the truth from fiction.  Scarily, there are still people out there making a living from attempting to convince the world that we never went to the moon at all, let alone the anal rumblings over which watch was used at the time.    

The story of how the watch was selected for the space programme and how it eventually came to be the ‘first watch worn on the moon’ during the Apollo 12 moon landing is just as fascinating.  As a company director of a small water engineering consultancy, I’ve had the misfortune to deal with the astonishingly bureaucratic and slow procurement processes most large organisations employ in buying new goods and services.  I’m sure you would expect a government organisation like NASA to undertake the highest standards of evaluation, re-evaluation and other mind-bendingly protracted quality system processes to seeking a supplier for a watch for their space missions.  Not so, in fact NASA back in 1961, realising that they were running short of time in the race for space, sent a buyer for flight equipment, incognito, to ‘Corrigan’s’ watch shop in Houston, Texas to purchase five chronographs for testing purposes, all of different brands including the Omega Speedmaster.  The Speedmaster has been in production since 1957. It was never designed or modified by NASA (contrary to some folklore) and in fact, Omega were completely unaware of NASA’s intended use of the watch until much later. 

NASA’s engineers subjected the watches to various ’torture’ tests in order to simulate the conditions found in space.  Exposure to extreme heat, cooling, vibration and vacuum were all evaluated with the result being that only the Omega Speedmaster passed all the tests.  This lead to the watch being ‘Flight Qualified’ and it’s eventual use on the moon.  In a slight twist of fate, it wasn’t actually my namesake, Neil Armstrong’s Speedmaster that first landed on the moon. A problem had developed with the lunar craft’s timer which resulted in Armstrong’s ’Speedy’ being used as a backup device.  It wasn’t until Buzz Aldrin stepped on to the surface that the Speedmaster’s glory was sealed.

The Speedmaster continued to support the space programme for many years, with no revision other than to have the moniker ‘Professional’ added by Omega following it’s NASA endorsement.  It was even adopted by Russia’s cosmonauts and also fought off some very aggressive political lobbying to have ‘All American’ products (notably Bulova) supporting the space programme.   Post ‘69 models celebrated the lunar landing event with the caseback being inscribed ‘The first Watch worn on the moon’.  Omega extended their claim further later on to say ‘the First and ONLY watch worn on the moon’.  This statement was however proved incorrect when Apollo XV Astronaut David Scott testified to wearing a Waltham chronograph on the moon when the crystal of his Omega had ‘popped off’.

So the next time you find yourself in charge of a procurement project, just check your local supplier doesn’t have what you are looking for, in stock before spending millions reinventing the wheel!

As for my new Speedy, I doubt it will be asked to provide service in no more pressing an environment than the office, where temperatures can readily vary between an extreme 15 and 20deg C, and the only risk of serious impact is from me banging my fists on the table in frustration at those bureaucratic company buyers. 

My 1970 Omega Speedmaster

 

We are often asked, whether a particular vintage piece is suitable for everyday wear.  The answer to that is not quite as straight forward as it may seem and it really boils down to what compromises you are prepared to make for your timepiece.

At the same time as getting into vintage watches, I was working as a sales consultant for a software firm in the water industry.  This involved a fair degree of international travel, and inevitably the need to catch flights at certain times etc.,  Any person of average intelligence would have sensibly concluded that an accurate, robust and reliable timepiece would have been an essential accesory for such missions. Sadly, such practical considerations have often eluded me, and I would occasionally find myself either en-route to an airport or waiting in the departure lounge, staring at the face of whatever watch I was wearing, wondering why the hands weren’t moving. Luckily, unless you are undertaking regular commutes to un-inhabited climes, there is usually a secondary source of timekeeping, often more accurate too. 

One reasonable analogy is drawing parallels to classic car ownership.  It would take a very brave and committed individual to drive upwards of 15,000 miles per annum in a 1969 MGB Roadster.  Not only would they need the constitution of an ox to resist the assault on your senses, particulary at motorway speeds, but its likely they would be on first name terms with most of the AA patrol members in the country.   Nevertheless, there are people are out there that are prepared to make such commitments to their hobbies or interests, even claiming to be enjoying the experience. 

Wearing a vintage watch everyday is somewhat less demanding but some of the same principles remain.  At a basic level a manually wound watch needs winding every single day.  Not such a big deal I hear you cry, but I can barely remember to get up every day and if you forget to wind, you can be left wondering why its suddenly got dark at 2pm in the afternoon.    Then there is the water resistance to worry about;  Waterproof watches are a fairly recent phenomenom in the timeline of horology, but we seem to forget that complex mechanical devices don’t like to be used in the rain or washing the car, or heaven forbid used in the sea.   I can still remember the wince I gave reading an email where a customer asked me if the vintage 1960s diving watch I was selling was still capable of active service.  I think my reply was courteous, but it may have included a sarcastic reference to using a 1960s diving regulator.

The biggest threat to all mechanical timepieces is shock. The watch industry collectively found a number of reasonable solutions (Incabloc, KIF etc.) but again not until the late 1930s and even then, shock protection wasn’t de rigeur until much later.  Dropping a non shock protected watch to a hard floor, will break a balance staff pivot rendering the watch terminally broken, save from the rescuing hands of the most skilled watchmakers. 

 So after such ramblings the answer really is, Yes, its all perfectly possible but be reasonable and be prepared to make some sacrifices for your timepiece like taking it off when fixing the car or doing the washing up.

The most sensible suggestion of course is to have an army of vintage watches to share the load and a £5 rubber Casio for those moments where you can find yourself up to your arms in paint, concrete or if you have problems with drains, something much worse. 

If you really want to use a single vintage watch every day then make sure a) its shock protected b) have it serviced regularly  and c) you are very careful with it.   Barring an unfortunate accident, there is nothing that should prevent the said watch outliving your own time, and being available for the next generation.